Show simple item record

contributor authorRichard H. McCuen
contributor authorGulsah Akar
contributor authorIan A. Gifford
contributor authorDeepa Srikantaiah
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:58Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:58Z
date copyrightOctober 2009
date issued2009
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282009%29135%3A4%28153%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47972
description abstractCommunication between advisees and their research advisers while they are in graduate school has a major impact on their academic and research performance. A model of communication process was verified using results from a poll of more than 100 engineering graduate students. Major findings from the results and analyses include that advisees appreciate an adviser’s concern, pressure, and timely feedback. However, graduate students would like their advisers to be more sensitive to their lack of technical knowledge. Feedback from the advisee to the adviser can increase the likelihood of effective communication. In addition, advisers need to better guide their students in career building aspects during the Ph.D. process (e.g., submitting papers to journals). Language differences do not appear to be significant barrier to effective communication. An array of recommendations for improving adviser-advisee communication is provided.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleRecommendations for Improving Graduate Adviser-Advisee Communication
typeJournal Paper
journal volume135
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:4(153)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record