Show simple item record

contributor authorAlbert Tiberi
contributor authorHazel Beh
contributor authorAmarjit Singh
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:36Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:36Z
date copyrightOctober 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282004%29130%3A4%28311%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47722
description abstractMechanic’s and materialman’s liens are an important alternative remedy for tradesmen who have not been paid for improvements made under a contract. These statutes allow the unpaid tradesman to place a lien on the improved property and then foreclose and force the sale of the property to satisfy the lien. While the procedures are technical and vary from state to state, general concepts are commonly shared. This article examines Hawaii’s mechanic’s lien statutes and case law and describes the basic procedures and requirements of the remedy for nonpayment on contracted work. Because a lien jeopardizes an owner’s interest in his real property, courts require strict compliance with procedural safeguards including notice and a right to a hearing to contest the lien before the property can be foreclosed. Owners can avoid the danger of liens by requiring payment bonds, by ensuring that subcontractors and suppliers are promptly paid, and by overseeing the project with care. The issues surrounding timely filing are emphasized.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMechanic’s Liens on Private Projects in Hawaii
typeJournal Paper
journal volume130
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:4(311)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record