Show simple item record

contributor authorJohn H. Page
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:50Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:50Z
date copyrightJanuary 1994
date issued1994
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281994%29120%3A1%2825%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47255
description abstractHigher education is being forced to make do with less money and to document how these limited funds are being spent. State legislatures have directed higher education to develop guidelines for assessing the student development and curriculum. Those programs that can document wise and efficient use of limited state funds in their assessment plans and reports will be in the best position to receive more funding or to continue to receive funds. Many engineering departments will see the implementation of a mandatory assessment program as one more lemon in a long line of useless administrative mandates that require many hours to fulfill and return no benefit to the department. This need not be the case. Engineering departments have in place the key parts of a three‐element assessment program: (1) The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology accreditation process; (2) the professional licensing process using the Fundamentals of Engineering exam; and (3) surveys of recent graduates and the employers of those recent graduates.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAssessment: How to Make Lemons into Lemonade
typeJournal Paper
journal volume120
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1994)120:1(25)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record