Show simple item record

contributor authorWilliam C. Lyons
contributor authorPeter C. Anselmo
contributor authorRobert G. Kuller
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:49Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:49Z
date copyrightOctober 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281993%29119%3A4%28378%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47234
description abstractThe sources of research funding for U.S. academic institutions are examined through the past two decades. Of particular interest has been the flow of funding to engineering schools. Since the end of World War II most of the funding to our engineering schools has come from federal government sources. It is argued that the research projects carried out with federal funding support are much more science oriented than the research (and development) projects that are supported by industry funds. This science orientation in engineering research has greatly influenced the way engineering faculties view undergraduate education. Because of this science influence, entry‐level engineers in the U.S. enter the work force with little background in professional and related business subjects. It is postulated that this lack of professional training for our entry‐level engineers has significantly contributed to the nation's long‐term decline in the global competitiveness of U.S. technology‐based industries.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEngineering Education for Competitive International Economy
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1993)119:4(378)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record