Show simple item record

contributor authorJohn A. Alexander
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
date copyrightJanuary 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281991%29117%3A1%2810%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47039
description abstractBasic microeconomic principles are used to evaluate the widely anticipated shortage of civil engineers. Long‐term trends, demographic projections, and data on numbers of graduates and their starting salaries are considered. Civil engineering salary trends are compared to trends for other professions. The study found little evidence to support the widely accepted forecast of a civil engineering shortage. Instead, it found that we are in a period of oversupply. It also found many forecasts of civil engineering shortages during the last 35 years, but no evidence that any of these shortages actually happened. Skepticism of shortage forecasts is urged. Evidence of quality problems in civil engineering students, graduates, and practice are cited. These problems are related to the long‐term oversupply of civil engineers and the resulting weak economic and professional position of civil engineering. Since additional students will worsen these problems and further lower the quality and stature of civil engineering, recruiting should be stopped and direct action taken to raise the quality of civil engineering students, graduates, and practice.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleProfessionalism and Marketing of Civil Engineering Profession
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1991)117:1(10)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record