Show simple item record

contributor authorArthur A. DeFraites, Jr.
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:15Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:15Z
date copyrightApril 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281989%29115%3A2%28125%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46921
description abstractMr. DeFraites, a former COFPAES Chairman, discusses the quality of the design product as it relates to an owner's professional selection and procurement procedure. Project quality, the level of professional services to be provided, and fee are all related to the procurement process. Bidding establishes an adversarial relationship between the owner and the design professional; it is expensive and time‐consuming. The innovative ability of the design professional is not evaluated in a bidding process. The qualification‐based selection process results in a compatible owner/design professional team truly representing the best interest of the owner. “Price‐as‐a‐factor” procurement procedures have all of the disadvantages of straight bidding plus considerable additional cost to the design professionals involved.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleFee versus Quality
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1989)115:2(125)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record