| contributor author | Arthur A. DeFraites, Jr. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:19:15Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:19:15Z | |
| date copyright | April 1989 | |
| date issued | 1989 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%291052-3928%281989%29115%3A2%28125%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46921 | |
| description abstract | Mr. DeFraites, a former COFPAES Chairman, discusses the quality of the design product as it relates to an owner's professional selection and procurement procedure. Project quality, the level of professional services to be provided, and fee are all related to the procurement process. Bidding establishes an adversarial relationship between the owner and the design professional; it is expensive and time‐consuming. The innovative ability of the design professional is not evaluated in a bidding process. The qualification‐based selection process results in a compatible owner/design professional team truly representing the best interest of the owner. “Price‐as‐a‐factor” procurement procedures have all of the disadvantages of straight bidding plus considerable additional cost to the design professionals involved. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Fee versus Quality | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 115 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1989)115:2(125) | |
| tree | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |