Show simple item record

contributor authorRon D. Grovar
contributor authorEdward J. Rhomberg
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:01Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:01Z
date copyrightJuly 1987
date issued1987
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281987%29113%3A3%28257%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46774
description abstractEngineers in the federal government are provided with one of two types of immunity (absolute or qualified) from liability litigation, if certain conditions are met. These conditions were not derived from statutes but developed in the courts over the years. To receive absolute immunity an official must act within the scope of his or her duties and perform a discretionary function. Qualified immunity is provided in cases involving violations of constitutional rights, and if officials can demonstrate the following: (1). They acted in good faith; (2) their conduct was valid; and (3) they acted in the framework of their duties. To show how the courts developed, interpreted, and applied these requirements, such as discretionary functions, several court cases are reviewed. Many of the cases involve public works and construction operations on military installations for the benefit of military engineers, public works officials, and construction administrators. However, the same requirements and immunities apply to all government officials with few exceptions, i.e., judges.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLiability of Engineers in Federal Government
typeJournal Paper
journal volume113
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1987)113:3(257)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record