Show simple item record

contributor authorA. Jaafari
contributor authorA. Schub
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:58Z
date available2017-05-08T21:18:58Z
date copyrightMarch 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281990%29116%3A1%2868%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46730
description abstractThis paper presents the results of a field study of a sample of 15 projects and an equal number of organizations in the Federal Republic of Germany. The study objectives are firstly to elucidate typical approaches currently taken to technical and technological risks in engineering projects; and secondly to see if the existing concepts and techniques can be improved further. The work indicates that there is a need to radically revise the attitude and approach to identification, assessment of the impacts, and “engineering out” or mitigation of these risks. A major finding not widely recognized concerns the relationship between risk reduction and business profitability. A case is made for the introduction of a proactive management policy to technical and technological risk control involving the entire organization. Case material shows that the acceptance of risks by construction contractors in depressed market conditions is a deadly gamble, as it will inevitably lead to severe cost penalties. An alternative approach based on a higher level of risk assessment and work organization is presented in this paper. For this to be successful, adoption of a different management philosophy is required.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSurviving Failures: Lessons from Field Study
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:1(68)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record