Show simple item record

contributor authorHarvey A. Kagan
contributor authorJames Van de Water
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:56Z
date available2017-05-08T21:18:56Z
date copyrightJanuary 1986
date issued1986
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281986%29112%3A1%2858%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46703
description abstractThe rise in the number of lawsuits against engineers and architects has become a major concern to the design profession. Engineers and architects face lawsuits not only from their clients, but from contractors, construction workers and users of their designs. This article traces the evolution of this situation through a review of significant legal decisions. Until the 1950s designers were generally protected from lawsuits from third parties by the privity doctrine, and there was no need for professional liability insurance. Courts have since allowed greater latitude to the parties who can bring lawsuits against designers. The result has been a skyrocketing increase in the cost of professional liability insurance, making the coverage too costly for many small firms. Even more serious is the discouragement to creativity in design that this has caused. This is a serious problem that can only be solved by the active cooperation of the engineering, architecture and legal professions.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDesign in Jeopardy: The Expanding Legal Responsibilities of Engineers
typeJournal Paper
journal volume112
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1986)112:1(58)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record