Show simple item record

contributor authorNeil S. Grigg
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:48Z
date available2017-05-08T21:18:48Z
date copyrightApril 1983
date issued1983
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281983%29109%3A2%2871%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46634
description abstractResponsibility for administration of environmental programs will fall heavily on state governments in the years ahead. In state environmental agencies there are some who advocate “programmatic” organizations and some who advocate “functional” organizations and some who advocate “functional” organizations. Experiences with both types in North Carolina's Division of Environmental Management are reviewed. The “programmatic” organization has worked best. There are implications for the practical feasibility of integrating environmental management. Lessons learned include: the dependence of organizational effectiveness on leadership; the hidden costs of reorganization; the importance of bureaucratic and political realities; the uniqueness of situations; and the general importance of the subject to the effectiveness of state government.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIs Integrated Environmental Management Feasible?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume109
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1983)109:2(71)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record