Show simple item record

contributor authorDaniel M. White
contributor authorHuan Luong
contributor authorRobert L. Irvine
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:13:56Z
date available2017-05-08T21:13:56Z
date copyrightMarch 1998
date issued1998
identifier other%28asce%290887-381x%281998%2912%3A1%281%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/43651
description abstractIn Alaska, the procedures used to quantify petroleum in organic soil are complicated by the presence of natural organic matter (NOM). A percentage of what appears to be contamination in some soil samples is actually NOM. The “contamination” derived from NOM (i.e., biogenic interference) cannot be quantified separately from petroleum using currently available analytical methods unless a “background” sample that is known to be uncontaminated can be obtained. Proving that a background sample is truly uncontaminated is often problematic, if not impossible. In the research described here, the concentration of biogenic interference in petroleum contaminated soils was inferred using pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry without a background sample by quantifying the concentration of a suite of compounds called “biogenic indicators.” These indicators were selected because they are present in NOM, not present in petroleum, and similar in structure and origin to biogenic interference. This paper discusses the method and its limitations.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePyrolysis-GC/MS Analysis of Contaminated Soils in Alaska
typeJournal Paper
journal volume12
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Cold Regions Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(1998)12:1(1)
treeJournal of Cold Regions Engineering:;1998:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record