Show simple item record

contributor authorLi, Chen
contributor authorHuang, Gang
contributor authorQiang, Xianjie
contributor authorZou, Jianjun
contributor authorWang, Jian
contributor authorZhang, Xiaogang
contributor authorXu, Junbo
contributor authorJin, Zhongmin
date accessioned2026-08-23T08:03:12Z
date available2026-08-23T08:03:12Z
date copyright2026/02/01
date issued2026
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio-25-1033.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316010
description abstractAbstract. In order to develop an efficient and safe direct ventricular assist device, this study analyzed the effects of compression, torsion, and compression–torsion loading modes on the ventricles. A three-dimensional (3D) dynamic biventricular finite element model of a patient with heart failure (HF) was developed, and three different loading modes of direct ventricular assist devices were simulated to evaluate their advantages by comparing the hemodynamic and biomechanical parameters. For the compression and torsion modes, the range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from a baseline of 36.2% to a maximum of 47.9% and 40.6%. For the compression–torsion mode, applying a 40 deg torsion angle at 2.5 kPa compression mode increased the LVEF from 40.45% to 43.6%. However, applying a 40 deg torsion angle on the 7.5 kPa compression mode, the ejection fraction decreased from 47.7% to 45.9%. Meanwhile, the maximum principal stresses in the compression mode were generally below 80 kPa, whereas the maximum principal stresses in the multiple nodes of torsion and compression–torsion were greater than 150 kPa. The compression assist mode is more effective and safer than the torsion mode. Applying torsion at lower pressure (2.5 kPa + 40 deg) further increased the output, whereas applying torsion at higher pressure (7.5 kPa + 40 deg) decreased the output of the device. These experiments provide a theoretical basis for the design and optimization of direct ventricular assist devices.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Hemodynamic and Biomechanics of Direct Ventricular Assist Devices in Various Loading Modes: A Simulation Study
typeJournal Paper
journal volume148
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4068928
journal fristpage3599
journal lastpage3726
page128
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record