Show simple item record

contributor authorAgrawal, Akash
contributor authorMcComb, Christopher
date accessioned2026-08-23T07:37:54Z
date available2026-08-23T07:37:54Z
date copyright2026/01/01
date issued2026
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd-24-1816.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315376
description abstractAbstract. Multifidelity reinforcement learning (RL) frameworks significantly enhance the efficiency of engineering design by leveraging analysis models with varying levels of accuracy and computational costs. The prevailing methodologies, characterized by transfer learning, human-inspired strategies, control variate techniques, and adaptive sampling, predominantly depend on a structured hierarchy of models. However, this reliance on a model hierarchy overlooks the heterogeneous error distributions of models across the design space, extending beyond mere fidelity levels. This work proposes adaptively learned policy with heterogeneous analyses (ALPHA), a novel multifidelity RL framework to efficiently learn a high-fidelity policy by adaptively leveraging an arbitrary set of nonhierarchical, heterogeneous, low-fidelity models alongside a high-fidelity model. Specifically, low-fidelity policies and their experience data are dynamically used for efficient targeted learning, guided by their alignment with the high-fidelity policy. The effectiveness of ALPHA is demonstrated in analytical test optimization and octocopter design problems, utilizing two low-fidelity models alongside a high-fidelity one. The results highlight ALPHA's adaptive capability to dynamically utilize models across time and design space, eliminating the need for scheduling models as required in a hierarchical framework. Furthermore, the adaptive agents find more direct paths to high-performance solutions, showing superior convergence behavior compared to hierarchical agents.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAdaptive Learning of Design Policies Over Nonhierarchical Multi-Fidelity Models Guided by Policy Alignment
typeJournal Paper
journal volume148
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4069277
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record