Show simple item record

contributor authorBair, Scott
date accessioned2026-08-23T07:24:19Z
date available2026-08-23T07:24:19Z
date copyright2026/08/01
date issued2026
identifier issn0742-4787
identifier othertrib-26-1100.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315056
description abstractAbstract. Ward Winer was a pioneer in the high-pressure rheology of liquid lubricants who championed the use of viscometers to understand the rheology of elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL). The classical approach to EHL ignores viscosity measured in high-pressure viscometers and substitutes fictional narratives regarding Barus, Roelands, and Eyring to justify the use of viscosities that cannot be measured in viscometers. To make film thickness formulas appear to be accurate, the pressure-viscosity coefficient can be easily adjusted. Lacking an accurate description of the temperature, pressure, and shear dependences of viscosity, researchers have resorted to some unusual assumptions to explain friction. Among these have been time-dependent viscosity, viscoelasticity, and wall-slip. It is well past the appropriate time to begin to base all EHL analysis on empirical fact and end the teaching of the fictional stories concerning rheology to tribology students.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleThe Barus–Roelands–Eyring Viscosity Artifice: A Catastrophe for Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
typeJournal Paper
journal volume148
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Tribology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4071416
journal fristpage580
journal lastpage590
page11
treeJournal of Tribology:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record