Show simple item record

contributor authorDammann, Maximilian
contributor authorSchulten, Benedikt
contributor authorGoeing, Jan
contributor authorSteiner, Maximilian
contributor authorKoster, Max
contributor authorFriedrichs, Jens
contributor authorSeume, Joerg R.
contributor authorWein, Lars
date accessioned2026-08-23T07:21:25Z
date available2026-08-23T07:21:25Z
date copyright2026/08/01
date issued2026
identifier issn0742-4795
identifier othergtp-25-1621.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4314985
description abstractAbstract. Maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) of jet engines rely on geometric inspection and aerothermodynamic performance analysis of compressor and turbine blades. In order to analyze the variability of airfoil parameters due to manufacturing tolerances and deterioration effects and to investigate the impact of the geometric variability on jet engine efficiency, previous studies have developed various airfoil parameterization and reconstruction methods. However, these methods were adapted for blades and vanes of specific compressor or turbine stages, while general-purpose methods have not been developed yet for stator vanes and rotor blades. Therefore, this study compiled nominal and measurement data for several compressor and turbine stages of four different commercial turbofan engines. These data were subsequently used to develop general-purpose parameterization and reconstruction methods based on new approaches for (i) the determination of the camber line, (ii) the mathematical description of airfoil profiles at leading and trailing edges, and (iii) the reconstruction of airfoil shapes. The parameterization and reconstruction of both nominal and measurement data show that the methods are robust and reliable and provide accurate results. The methods can be utilized for the geometry analysis of non-nominal (especially deteriorated) blades and for the geometry alteration of nominal blades to investigate deterioration effects. Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates that robust methods should have fewer underlying assumptions and more complex software routines compared to tailored approaches for specific compressor or turbine stages. Such routines are, in particular, recommended for nominal blades of high-pressure turbines (HPT) and deteriorated blades.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleMaintenance of Jet Engines: Robust Parameterization and Reconstruction of Compressor and Turbine Blades
typeJournal Paper
journal volume148
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4070338
journal fristpage515
journal lastpage525
page11
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record