Show simple item record

contributor authorDonlin, Margo C.
contributor authorHigginson, Jill S.
date accessioned2025-04-21T10:16:13Z
date available2025-04-21T10:16:13Z
date copyright9/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
date issued2024
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio_146_12_121007.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305839
description abstractFunctional electrical stimulation (FES) is often used in poststroke gait rehabilitation to address decreased walking speed, foot drop, and decreased forward propulsion. However, not all individuals experience clinically meaningful improvements in gait function with stimulation. Previous research has developed adaptive functional electrical stimulation (AFES) systems that adjust stimulation timing and amplitude at every stride to deliver optimal stimulation. The purpose of this work was to determine the effects of a novel AFES system on functional gait outcomes and compare them to the effects of the existing FES system. Twenty-four individuals with chronic poststroke hemiparesis completed 64-min walking trials on an adaptive and fixed-speed treadmill with no stimulation, stimulation from the existing FES system, and stimulation from the AFES system. There was no significant effect of stimulation condition on walking speed, peak dorsiflexion angle, or peak propulsive force. Walking speed was significantly faster and peak propulsive force was significantly larger on the adaptive treadmill (ATM) than the fixed-speed treadmill (both p < 0.0001). Dorsiflexor stimulation timing was similar between stimulation conditions, but plantarflexor stimulation timing was significantly improved with the AFES system compared to the FES system (p = 0.0059). Variability between and within subjects was substantial, and some subjects experienced clinically meaningful improvements in walking speed, peak dorsiflexion angle, and peak propulsive force. However, not all subjects experienced benefits, suggesting that further research to characterize which subjects exhibit the best instantaneous response to FES is needed to optimize poststroke gait rehabilitation using FES.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleWe Will, We Will Shock You: Adaptive Versus Conventional Functional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals Post-Stroke
typeJournal Paper
journal volume146
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4066419
journal fristpage121007-1
journal lastpage121007-9
page9
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record