Show simple item record

contributor authorSchwartz, Henry
contributor authorSolakivi, Tomi
contributor authorSpohr, Jonas
contributor authorGustafsson, Magnus
date accessioned2025-04-21T09:59:44Z
date available2025-04-21T09:59:44Z
date copyright9/3/2024 12:00:00 AM
date issued2024
identifier issn0892-7219
identifier otheromae_147_3_031405.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305270
description abstractThe shipping sector must reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. Consumers demand green travel and transport services, but shipping is still to a large extent powered by fossil fuels. One of the key factors affecting the released emissions onboard the ship is the type of fuel utilized. Technological development is making new kinds of engines running with carbon-neutral fuels available. However, the new build and retrofit projects encountering the green transition have to be planned in detail. We analyze future cash flows of ropax ships operating with different types of fuel systems on an identical route. We base our findings on calculated asset values and internal rates of return. Based on our analysis of the given scenarios, the transition to carbon-neutral fuels comes with a cost for the shipping companies. In the forthcoming shipping competition, ships using fossil fuels will be more likely than their less polluting counterparts to be categorized as stranded assets.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleCapital Destruction—What is the Cost of Carbon-Neutrality in Shipping Competition?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume147
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4066065
journal fristpage31405-1
journal lastpage31405-13
page13
treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2024:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record