| description abstract | Long periods of extreme precipitation can cause costly damages to a region’s infrastructure while also creating a higher risk for the region’s population. Planning for these periods would ideally begin at the subseasonal-to-seasonal time scale, yet prediction of precipitation at this time scale has low skill. In this study, we will use Jennrich et al.’s database of 14-day extreme precipitation events to understand more about the synoptic connections and impacts of these extended extreme events. The synoptic connections of events were examined using the composites of event-day 500-hPa geopotential height and precipitable water anomalies. The combination of these two drivers leads to higher skill in the West Coast and Great Lakes than other regions, with an equitable threat score of 0.137 and 0.084, respectively, and higher conditional probabilities of event occurrence. Therefore, the synoptic patterns associated with events, although significant, are not unique, which poses prediction challenges. Historical impacts of these events, using NCEI storm reports, were assessed to benefit decision-makers in future risk mitigation. A variety of reports were found during events, from winter weather reports in West Coast events to tropical storm reports in Southeast events. Every region has significantly more flooding reports during events than in nonextreme 14-day periods, demonstrating the impacts of such extended events. Although there is still much to learn about extreme precipitation events, this study contributes to the foundational knowledge of synoptic drivers and impacts of events. | |
