Show simple item record

contributor authorÖztürk, Erkan;Yıldızlı, Kemal
date accessioned2022-12-27T23:16:21Z
date available2022-12-27T23:16:21Z
date copyright8/3/2022 12:00:00 AM
date issued2022
identifier issn1087-1357
identifier othermanu_144_10_101010.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288260
description abstractCompared with dry machining, using traditional cutting fluids has some weaknesses, such as environmental pollution, high machining costs, and harmful effects on human health. Internally cooled cutting tools (ICCTs) have been promising, sustainable, health-friendly, and green technologies for turning applications. However, the effects of different types of internal coolant fluids on insert tip temperature (Ttip) have not been investigated for ICCTs. The machining quality of metallic materials and tool life can improve with effective cooling. This study investigates the internal cooling performance of a self-designed internally cooled smart cutting tool (ICSCT) by comparing different heat transfer fluids. Therefore, a conjugate heat transfer (CHT) model was set for a self-designed ICSCT. The CHT simulation was experimentally confirmed using pure water (…developed by Ozturk, E., Yildizli, K., and Saglam, F., 2021, “Investigation on an Innovative Internally Cooled Smart Cutting Tool With the Built-In Cooling-Control System,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 46(3), pp. 2397–2411). After that, the effects of flow velocity (Vf) and the inlet temperature of the coolant fluid (Tinlet) alongside different types of glycol-based heat transfer fluids (including pure water) on Ttip were statistically evaluated by the Taguchi method and analysis of the variance (ANOVA). It was found that the most influential factor was the Tinlet at a contribution ratio level of 88.32%. Additionally, according to statistics, Vf and the type of heat transfer fluid were significant. Hence, since no external coolant is used, the designed smart tool can be considered environmentally friendly and health-friendly. In conclusion, glycol-based fluids can be a better choice for internally cooled tool designs owing to their superior features, e.g., corrosion prevention, nontoxicity, and stable heat transfer capability at lower temperatures compared to pure water, although pure water has better thermal properties than the glycol-based fluids (Dynalene Heat Transfer Fluids Technical Datasheets, Cited March 31, 2020).
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Thermal Behavior of Self-Designed Internally Cooled Cutting Tool for Various Heat Transfer Fluids-Statistic and Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach
typeJournal Paper
journal volume144
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4055051
journal fristpage101010
journal lastpage101010_9
page9
treeJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record