Validation and Bias Correction of Forecast Reference Evapotranspiration for Agricultural Applications in Nevada

Abstract

Accurate estimates of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) are critical for estimating actual crop evapotranspiration and agricultural water use. This study uses observations from the Nevada Integrated Climate and Evapotranspiration Network (NICE Net) to validate forecasts of ET0 and its driving variables from the National Weather Service’s National Digital Forecast Database (NDFD). Daily NDFD ET0 at lead times of 1 to 6 days were compared against 18 NICE Net stations. Correlations between NDFD and observations generally ranged between 0.4 and 0.9, with lower correlations at longer leads and a notable drop in skill during July and August. Systematic arid biases (high bias for temperatures and low bias for humidity) were found in NDFD with a strong warm minimum temperature bias and low vapor pressure bias most prominent during the growing season. Some of the largest relative biases were found in wind speed, although they were systematic and varied greatly by location. A case study revealed that NDFD consistently underestimates the variability found in observed minimum temperature, solar radiation, wind speed, and ET0. Cloudy days during summer were not well represented in the NDFD estimated solar radiation, which had a cascading impact on temperature, vapor pressure, and ET0 estimates. A monthly ratio-based bias-correction was applied to NDFD ET0, which reduced the root-mean squared error by 5%–30% for most locations. Bias-corrected ET0 forecasts from NDFD or other forecast systems show potential as a guide to develop weekly irrigation schedules for agricultural producers, with the ultimate goal of reducing applications of excess irrigation water.