| contributor author | Luis Cea | |
| contributor author | Gabriela Vila | |
| contributor author | Gonzalo García-Alén | |
| contributor author | Jerónimo Puertas | |
| contributor author | Luis Pena | |
| date accessioned | 2022-12-27T20:38:31Z | |
| date available | 2022-12-27T20:38:31Z | |
| date issued | 2022/08/01 | |
| identifier other | (ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001992.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4287705 | |
| description abstract | The backwater effect generated by bridges can significantly increase the risk of flooding. In this work we compare two different methods to include the effect of bridges in two-dimensional (2D) shallow water models. The first method is based on empirical discharge equations that are implemented as internal conditions. The second method is the recently proposed 2D extension of the two-component pressure approach, which accounts for the vertical confinement of the flow. Both approaches are tested and compared using a new set of experimental data obtained in 32 laboratory tests, including four different bridge geometries under different flow conditions. The results show that both methods can reproduce the observed bridge afflux for a wide range of flow conditions, but the two-component pressure approach is less dependent on model calibration. On the other hand, both methods fail to correctly reproduce the 2D water depth patterns observed around the bridge. | |
| publisher | ASCE | |
| title | Hydraulic Modeling of Bridges in Two-Dimensional Shallow Water Models | |
| type | Journal Article | |
| journal volume | 148 | |
| journal issue | 8 | |
| journal title | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001992 | |
| journal fristpage | 06022006 | |
| journal lastpage | 06022006_11 | |
| page | 11 | |
| tree | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 008 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |