Show simple item record

contributor authorTalukdar
contributor authorRahul Gautam;Saviour
contributor authorCeby Mullakkara;Tiwarekar
contributor authorKaustubh;Dhara
contributor authorSantanu;Gupta
contributor authorSanjay
date accessioned2022-08-18T12:54:18Z
date available2022-08-18T12:54:18Z
date copyright5/27/2022 12:00:00 AM
date issued2022
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio_144_10_101011.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4287070
description abstractSpinal fusion is an effective surgical treatment for intervertebral disk degeneration. However, the consequences of implantation with interbody cages on load transfer and bone remodeling in the vertebral bodies have scarcely been investigated. Using detailed three-dimensional models of an intact and implanted lumbar spine and the strain energy density based bone remodeling algorithm, this study aimed to investigate the evolutionary changes in distribution of bone density (ρ) around porous and solid interbody cages. Follower load technique and submodeling approach were employed to simulate applied loading conditions on the lumbar spine models. The study determined the relationship between mechanical properties and parametrical characteristics of porous body-centered-cubic (BCC) models, which corroborated well with Gibson-Ashby and exponential regression models. Variations in porosity affected the peri-prosthetic stress distributions and bone remodeling around the cages. In comparison to the solid cage, stresses and strains in the cancellous bone decreased with an increase in cage porosity; whereas the range of motion increased. For the solid cage, increase in bone density of 20–28% was predicted in the L4 inferior and L5 superior regions; whereas the model with 78% porosity exhibited a small 3–5% change in bone density. An overall increase of 9–14% bone density was predicted in the L4 and L5 vertebrae after remodeling for solid interbody cages, which may influence disk degeneration in the adjacent segment. In comparison to the solid cage, an interbody cage with 65-78% porosity could be a viable and promising alternative, provided sufficient mechanical strength is offered.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleBone Remodeling Around Solid and Porous Interbody Cages in the Lumbar Spine
typeJournal Paper
journal volume144
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4054457
journal fristpage101011-1
journal lastpage101011-12
page12
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record