Show simple item record

contributor authorSchmid, Michal
contributor authorPaščenko, Petr
contributor authorBozkurt, Fatih
contributor authorPetržela, Pavel
date accessioned2022-05-08T08:51:20Z
date available2022-05-08T08:51:20Z
date copyright11/23/2021 12:00:00 AM
date issued2021
identifier issn1948-5085
identifier othertsea_14_7_071010.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284426
description abstractThis article demonstrates, via a comprehensive study, the necessity of using a 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach for heat exchanger (HTX) modeling within underhood vehicle simulation. The results are presented as the difference between 1D and 3D CFD approaches with a focus on auxiliary fluid (e.g., coolant) temperature prediction as a function of primary fluid (e.g., air) inlet conditions. It has been shown that the 1D approach could significantly underpredict auxiliary fluid inlet temperature due to neglecting the spatial distribution of primary fluid velocity magnitude. The resultant difference in the auxiliary fluid flow HTX inlet temperature is presented and discussed as a function of the uniformity index (UI) of the primary fluid flow velocity magnitude. In addition, the 3D HTX model’s importance is demonstrated in an industrial example of full 3D underhood simulation.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleImportance of Three-Dimensional Vehicle Heat Exchanger Modeling
typeJournal Paper
journal volume14
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
identifier doi10.1115/1.4052693
journal fristpage71010-1
journal lastpage71010-7
page7
treeJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2021:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record