Show simple item record

contributor authorLandi, Luca
contributor authorUhlmann, Eckart
contributor authorHörl, Robert
contributor authorThom, Simon
contributor authorGigliotti, Giuseppe
contributor authorStecconi, Alessandro
date accessioned2022-05-08T08:41:01Z
date available2022-05-08T08:41:01Z
date copyright12/14/2021 12:00:00 AM
date issued2021
identifier issn2332-9017
identifier otherrisk_008_02_021203.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284209
description abstractMachine guards provide protection against the ejection of parts during operation, such as chips or workpiece fragments. They are considered safe if the impact resistance is at least as high as the resulting projectile energy in the worst case of damage. To protect the machine operator, the impact resistance of machine guards is determined according to ISO standards. The bisection method can be used to determine the impact resistance through impact tests. However, this method is inaccurate for a small number of impact tests and does not indicate uncertainties in the determination. Moreover, the result of testing is validated in different ways depending on the standard utilized for testing. Relevant uncertainties affecting impact testing and a new probabilistic approach for assessing the impact resistance using the Recht and Ipson equation are presented. With multiple impact tests at different initial velocities a Recht and Ipson best-fit curve and a confidence interval for a ballistic limit can be obtained, which is used to determine the impact resistance by defining a velocity reduction coefficient. This method can be applied to any machine guard made of ductile material. This paper validates the Recht and Ipson method by performing impact tests with a standardized 2.5 kg projectile on polycarbonate sheets of different thicknesses. Determination of the ballistic limit showed good agreement with experimental results. With the ballistic limits, the velocity reduction coefficients have been found to determine the impact resistances. Therefore, an alternative method for standardized tests to determine the impact resistance was found.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleEvaluation of Testing Uncertainties for the Impact Resistance of Machine Guards
typeJournal Paper
journal volume8
journal issue2
journal titleASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg
identifier doi10.1115/1.4052995
journal fristpage21203-1
journal lastpage21203-7
page7
treeASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2021:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record