Show simple item record

contributor authorNagashima, Kazufumi
contributor authorYasuda, Nakahiro
date accessioned2022-02-05T21:51:50Z
date available2022-02-05T21:51:50Z
date copyright10/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
date issued2020
identifier issn2332-8983
identifier otherners_007_01_011701.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276481
description abstractThis paper aims at verifying the current Japanese Emergency Response Guideline, especially the “notification” (reporting) scheme of emergency action level (EAL), through the analysis of the progress of Fukushima nuclear accident. We compared timing and emergency classification between two datasets of the plant statuses which expressed by the old prediction-based notification and the latest EAL-based notification, in order to assess the current EAL scheme along the effectiveness of protective action for the local residents. We observed that the plant statuses expressed by the current EAL-based notification gave more engineering insights in the earliest accident phase to identify the accident scenario. However, potential improvement area of the guideline was also observed in the following severe accident management (SAM) phase after the trigger of first precautionary action, where we are required to reduce uncertainties in both processes of the operator's notification and the government's decision making by evaluating the progression speed of the severe accident.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleStudy on Description of Plant Status at Fukushima Accident by Emergency Action Level
typeJournal Paper
journal volume7
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
identifier doi10.1115/1.4046841
journal fristpage011701-1
journal lastpage011701-9
page9
treeJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2020:;volume( 007 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record