Show simple item record

contributor authorSiddiqi, Afreen
contributor authorRebentisch, Eric
contributor authorDorchuck, Samuel
contributor authorImanishi, Yuto
contributor authorTanimichi, Taisetsu
date accessioned2022-02-04T22:13:58Z
date available2022-02-04T22:13:58Z
date copyright9/28/2020 12:00:00 AM
date issued2020
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd_142_12_121404.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275146
description abstractArchitecture selection for systems undergoing rapid technological and market change is challenging. It is desirable to select architectures that can provide cost-effective possibilities for future changes and avoid architecture lock-in. However, optimal architectures for prevailing conditions may not be changeable for future adaptation. This tension between objectives for system (product) development for both short-term and long-term competitiveness has been an enduring challenge for system architects. Here, we use time-expanded decision networks (TDNs) with time-varying costs and demands to systematically explore future architecture transition pathways and strategically identify useful designs. We demonstrate a new application for autonomous driving (AD) systems, a nascent technology, where the design and capabilities of constituent components (such as sensors, processors, and data communication links) are still evolving and significant market and regulatory uncertainties persist. In this case, we model technology costs with time-based factors to explicitly include future trends. The results show that as cost differences between architectures increase and demand for new functionality changes with time, the approach is able to identify potential transition points between architecture choices that optimize the net present value (NPV) of the system. For some of the specific scenarios analyzed in this study, the NPV with optimal architecture transitions is at least 10–20% larger as compared with fixed cases. Overall, this work presents a case for planning and partly constructing architecture transition roadmaps for new systems wherein dominant architectures have not emerged.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleOptimizing Architecture Transitions Using Decision Networks
typeJournal Paper
journal volume142
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4048116
journal fristpage0121702-1
journal lastpage0121702-14
page14
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record