Show simple item record

contributor authorMichael K. Lindell
contributor authorJohn H. Sorensen
contributor authorEarl J. Baker
contributor authorWilliam P. Lehman
date accessioned2022-01-31T23:40:50Z
date available2022-01-31T23:40:50Z
date issued5/1/2021
identifier other%28ASCE%29NH.1527-6996.0000456.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270161
description abstractThe data on warning diffusion rates over time are generally sparse and are extremely limited for hurricanes. This is a potential problem for transportation analysts who are trying to compute evacuation time estimates for coastal jurisdictions. The available data indicate that 20%–50% of the households in areas at risk continually monitor local news media as soon as a hurricane is within 72 h of possible landfall in their area. Moreover, this percentage rises to 60%–80% within 64 h of landfall and over 90% within 48 h of landfall. The data from hurricane studies are consistent with data from another slow-onset hazard (the arrival of the Indian Ocean tsunami in Mauritius) and a somewhat less severe hazard (the Boston water contamination incident). There appears to be no data on warning diffusion in hurricanes with late intensification or late-changing tracks. However, the available data on warning sources in these types of hurricanes suggest that the rates of diffusion of local evacuation warnings would be comparable to those in other rapid-onset events.
publisherASCE
titleCommunity Response to Hurricane Threat: Estimates of Warning Diffusion Time Distributions
typeJournal Paper
journal volume22
journal issue2
journal titleNatural Hazards Review
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000456
journal fristpage04021007-1
journal lastpage04021007-8
page8
treeNatural Hazards Review:;2021:;Volume ( 022 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record