Show simple item record

contributor authorEduardo-Javier Elizondo-Martinez
contributor authorAlexandra Ossa-Lopez
contributor authorJorge Rodriguez-Hernandez
date accessioned2022-01-31T23:38:52Z
date available2022-01-31T23:38:52Z
date issued8/1/2021
identifier other%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0003791.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270095
description abstractThe main purpose of this article is to evaluate the correlation between the indirect tensile strength and the permeability capacity of porous concrete (PC) pavements. The compaction method employed plays a critical role in this correlation. However, even though PC pavements have been studied in many places around the world, using different compaction methods, a profound analysis of these methods has not been carried out yet. This research introduces a study of five different compaction methods: axial compression, gyratory, impact, multilayer impact, and tamping rod, with diverse treatments in each one to obtain the best correlation between the indirect tensile strength and permeability capacity. Results demonstrated that the impact compaction method at 50 blows on only one side of the sample gives the best strength-permeability correlation, with an indirect tensile (IT) strength value of 2.75 MPa and a permeability (k) capacity of 0.56  cm/s.
publisherASCE
titleEvaluation of the Effect of Different Compaction Methods on Porous Concrete Pavements: Correlation with Strength and Permeability
typeJournal Paper
journal volume33
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003791
journal fristpage04021184-1
journal lastpage04021184-8
page8
treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 033 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record