Show simple item record

contributor authorMitchell Scovell
contributor authorConnar McShane
contributor authorAnne Swinbourne
contributor authorDaniel Smith
date accessioned2022-01-30T22:43:18Z
date available2022-01-30T22:43:18Z
date issued2/1/2021
identifier other(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000417.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269476
description abstractStructural upgrades can mitigate property damage caused by tropical cyclones. However, people in high-risk areas do not always install these upgrades. This paper used the protective action decision model (PADM) as a theoretical framework for explaining one specific type of structural mitigation behavior: the installation of cyclone shutters. The results indicated that the degree to which people think and talk about cyclones (hazard intrusiveness) was a significant predictor of behavior but that risk perception was not. Moreover, the results show that people need to perceive that installing shutters has benefits beyond mitigating damage (e.g., increases property value and has utility for other purposes). Contrary to past research, it was also found that the perceived cost of shutter installation (in terms of time, money, and effort) was important. The results provide evidence for the utility of the PADM for explaining long-term, high-cost natural hazard mitigation behavior.
publisherASCE
titleApplying the Protective Action Decision Model to Explain Cyclone Shutter Installation Behavior
typeJournal Paper
journal volume22
journal issue1
journal titleNatural Hazards Review
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000417
journal fristpage04020043
journal lastpage04020043-8
page8
treeNatural Hazards Review:;2021:;Volume ( 022 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record