Show simple item record

contributor authorBrian Solan
contributor authorRobert Ettema
contributor authorDonal Ryan
contributor authorGerard A. Hamill
date accessioned2022-01-30T20:38:03Z
date available2022-01-30T20:38:03Z
date issued2/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
identifier other%28ASCE%29HY.1943-7900.0001675.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266846
description abstractShort-span masonry arch bridges constitute a significant proportion of the existing bridge inventory in the UK, Ireland, Europe, and the northeastern United States. These historic structures are founded typically on relatively shallow footings of unknown depth and configuration or on timber piles weakened by age and environmental exposure. Flume experiments used two common forms of short-span, masonry arch bridge and showed how local scour may readily undermine such structures. The experiments demonstrated that traditional hydraulic adjustments do not significantly reduce scour depth: streamlining abutments with wing walls and using cutwaters on piers. The usefulness of stone armor placed around abutments and piers was proven, but such armoring may relocate scour downstream of the bridge. The findings emphasize the scour-countermeasure benefits of foundation strengthening, flow bypassing by means of relief culverts (where feasible), and the use of channel armoring and energy-dissipation structures downstream of the bridge.
publisherASCE
titleScour Concerns for Short-Span Masonry Arch Bridges
typeJournal Paper
journal volume146
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001675
page7
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record