Show simple item record

contributor authorAfshin Ashrafzadeh
contributor authorOzgur Kişi
contributor authorPouya Aghelpour
contributor authorSeyed Mostafa Biazar
contributor authorMohammadreza Askarizad Masouleh
date accessioned2022-01-30T19:45:49Z
date available2022-01-30T19:45:49Z
date issued2020
identifier other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001471.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265933
description abstractEvapotranspiration estimation and forecasting is a key step in water management projects, especially in water-scarce countries such as Iran. Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA), support vector machine (SVM), and group method of data handling (GMDH) models were developed and assessed to find an appropriate model for short and long-term forecasting of monthly reference evapotranspiration in the Guilan Plain, northern Iran. Monthly meteorological data gathered from four weather stations (Anzali, Astara, Manjil, and Rasht) were used to calculate monthly reference evapotranspiration in the period of 1993–2014 using the FAO-56 Penman–Monteith (FAO-PM) equation. The evapotranspiration data from 1993 to 2012 were used to fit SARIMA models and calibrate SVM and GMDH models, and the monthly evapotranspiration rates for the years 2013 and 2014 were forecasted using the calibrated models. The developed models were assessed using RMS error (RMSE), the Pearson correlation coefficient (R), the Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), and percent bias. Taylor diagrams also were used to compare the accuracy of forecasts produced by the models. For the whole forecasting period (2013–2014), the RMSE of the calibrated SARIMA, SVM, and GMDH models were, respectively, 8.796, 9.830, and 9.547  mm/month for Anzali weather station; 8.136, 9.057, and 7.808  mm/month for Astara weather station; 9.454, 8.947, and 8.876  mm/month for Manjil weather station; and 9.301, 10.509, and 10.138  mm/month for Rasht weather station. In other words, in two weather stations under study (Anzali and Rasht), the best results were obtained from SARIMA; however, for Astara and Manjil weather stations, GMDH generated the best forecasts. Furthermore, at different forecasting horizons (1–24 months), the SARIMA models generally outperformed the SVM and GMDH models.
publisherASCE
titleComparative Study of Time Series Models, Support Vector Machines, and GMDH in Forecasting Long-Term Evapotranspiration Rates in Northern Iran
typeJournal Paper
journal volume146
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001471
page04020010
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record