Show simple item record

contributor authorNeil S. Grigg
date accessioned2019-09-18T10:42:59Z
date available2019-09-18T10:42:59Z
date issued2019
identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000319.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260641
description abstractActivists who oppose local government spending can defeat creative stormwater programs, often by using the slogan “rain tax” to convince the public that the financing plan is a tax increase. Use of fees is part of a general movement by local governments to operate like businesses through management processes. Stormwater programs are multifaceted and can package local improvements to help integrate urban water services and support the vitality of cities. Ultimately, this requires a mixture of funding sources, but reliance on runoff fees has attracted many legal and political challenges. Economic theories and public finance practices can clarify whether the fees are really taxes in disguise. Outcomes of legal developments in states show that either taxes or fees can be used for stormwater programs, and the differences may be smaller than expected. Ultimately, whether stormwater fees are taxes or not depends on nuanced differences as tested in courts under state law. Engineers and public works managers can use the experiences from litigation to sharpen their pencils and show that stormwater funding goes toward the purposes intended.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIs a Stormwater Fee a Rain Tax?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume11
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000319
page04519017
treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2019:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record