Show simple item record

contributor authorYue Choong Kog
date accessioned2019-03-10T12:23:32Z
date available2019-03-10T12:23:32Z
date issued2019
identifier other%28ASCE%29SC.1943-5576.0000410.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255456
description abstractThe British Standards Institution (BSI) permits core and nondestructive tests (NDTs), such as ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), rebound hammer, and pull-out tests, to estimate the in situ compressive strength of existing concrete structures. The ASTM test method, in addition, also permits the use of a penetration resistance test (e.g., Windsor probe). Sound engineering judgment and the appreciation of factors influencing each NDT and core test are required in developing the testing plan for estimating in situ compressive strength of concrete structures. There are precautions and practical considerations that must be recognized. The issues in using such tests for estimating in situ compressive strength would be discussed. The different approaches of the BSI codes to determine the in situ strength are illustrated with examples. Results obtained are compared to demonstrate the practical limitations of such approaches. Using any one of the NDTs or core tests yielded estimated in situ concrete compressive strengths that differed substantially.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleTesting Plan for Estimating In Situ Concrete Strength
typeJournal Paper
journal volume24
journal issue2
journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000410
page04019001
treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record