Show simple item record

contributor authorSennah Khaled;Mostafa Ahmed
date accessioned2019-02-26T07:58:42Z
date available2019-02-26T07:58:42Z
date issued2018
identifier other%28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0001184.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4250640
description abstractDeterioration of concrete bridge barriers as a result of corrosion of internal steel reinforcement in severe environmental conditions is a major problem. Glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars are currently used as an alternative to the conventional steel reinforcement because of their corrosion resistance, long-term durability properties, and exceptionally high tensile strength. A recent design project conducted at Ryerson University on a TL-5 bridge barrier proposed the use of 15 M and 13 M GFRP bars as vertical reinforcement in the barrier front and back faces at 3 mm spacing, respectively; 15 M GFRP bars were used as horizontal reinforcement in the barrier wall. The connection between the deck slab and the barrier wall utilized GFRP bars with a 18° hook for proper anchorage. To qualify the developed GFRP-reinforced barrier for use in Canada, a vehicle crash test was performed according to the safety-performance evaluation guidelines of the 29 AASHTO Manual for assessing safety hardware (MASH) for Test Level 5 (TL-5). The crash test involved a 36,-V vehicle impacting the barrier at a target impact speed and impact angle of 8 km/h and 15°, respectively. This article summarizes the procedure and the results of the vehicle crash test conducted on the developed GFRP-reinforced barrier. Criteria to evaluate crash-test results showed that (1) the barrier controlled and redirected the vehicle to the lane; the vehicle did not penetrate, underride, or override the barrier; (2) no concrete detached elements, fragments, or other debris from the barrier penetrated the occupant compartment or presented undue hazard to others in the area; (3) the occupant compartment remained undeformed; and (4) the truck remained upright during and after the collision. As such, the developed barrier performed acceptably according to MASH TL-5. The calculated equivalent impact force, acceleration, deflection, and recorded strains caused by vehicle impact are presented.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
typeJournal Paper
journal volume23
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001184
page4017139
treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record