Show simple item record

contributor authorGuévremont Michel;Hammad Amin
date accessioned2019-02-26T07:49:12Z
date available2019-02-26T07:49:12Z
date issued2018
identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000267.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249616
description abstractThe precedence diagram method (PDM) is an accepted standard in the construction industry and a recognized method in courts in case of delay claims. In particular, four-dimensional (4D) simulation is becoming more prevalent in the construction industry as a means of decreasing productivity losses and delay claims. A 4D simulation is generated by linking a project three-dimensional (3D) model with the PDM schedule. It can be used for the visualization of the critical path to identify the cause–effect relationships and the responsible entity in the context of claims avoidance or claims resolution. This paper explores the use of 4D simulation for the visual comparison of float values when analyzing shifts in the critical path caused by delays. The findings are provided using a specific delay claim analysis method (i.e., time impact analysis) to model a hydropower workshop inspired by the industry context. In summary, 4D simulation has evolved into a reliable method for delay claim analysis.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleVisualization of Delay Claim Analysis Using 4D Simulation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume10
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000267
page5018002
treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2018:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record