Show simple item record

contributor authorConsoli Nilo Cesar;Winter Daniel;Leon Helena Batista;Scheuermann Filho Hugo Carlos
date accessioned2019-02-26T07:43:56Z
date available2019-02-26T07:43:56Z
date issued2018
identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001928.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248985
description abstractWaste glass is a solid residue widely available in the urban centers, where it is discarded after being used in the most diverse applications (container for distinct products, tableware, decorative objects, civil construction, and the automobile industry). Carbide lime is a by-product from the manufacture of acetylene gas. This study evaluates the potential of combining these two wastes, finely ground waste glass and carbide lime, as a possible hydraulic cement (substituting portland cement) to enhance soil behavior. Such blends, when compacted, have potential application in earthworks such as beds of pipelines and spread footings, as well as base/subbase of pavements. Pozzolanic reactions occur between silica in amorphous phases (in ground waste glass) and Ca++ (in carbide lime) in an alkaline environment. The impact of the ground glass and the carbide lime content, as well as the dry unit weight, on the properties (strength, stiffness, and durability) of compacted sandy soil–ground waste glass–carbide lime mixes is quantified, where two soils have been used, Osorio sand and a clayey sand, Botucatu residual sandstone (BRS). A novel parameter, named the porosity/binder index (η/Biv), allows normalizing the behavior of the unconfined compressive strength (qu), the shear modulus at small strains (G), and the accumulated loss of mass (ALM) (after wetting-drying cycles) of the sandy soil–ground waste glass–carbide lime mixes, considering ground glass plus carbide lime as binder. Results have shown similar trends among qu, G, and ALM with η/Biv for the two studied sandy soils–ground glass–lime mixes, even though each was cured at an ambient temperature (23±2°C), but considering different curing periods (7 days for the former and 18 days for the latter).
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDurability, Strength, and Stiffness of Green Stabilized Sand
typeJournal Paper
journal volume144
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001928
page4018057
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record