Show simple item record

contributor authorZachary B. Sharp
contributor authorMichael C. Johnson
contributor authorSteven L. Barfuss
date accessioned2017-12-30T12:55:38Z
date available2017-12-30T12:55:38Z
date issued2018
identifier other%28ASCE%29HY.1943-7900.0001387.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243504
description abstractMany flow-meter applications require accurate flow measurement (0.5% of actual flow or better), whereas other applications accept less-accurate flow measurements. Some applications attempt to minimize head loss, whereas a few applications have ample energy such that a flow meter with higher head loss is preferred. In many instances where highly accurate flow measurement and low head loss are required, Venturi flow meters are a viable option. The accuracy of a Venturi for flow measurement is well established and well documented; however, the design of recovery cones and their associated head loss is not. This study uses computational fluid dynamics and laboratory data to demonstrate the relationship between recovery cone angle on the classical Venturi meter design and associated head loss. Results from this study show that the optimum recovery cone angle to minimize head loss is a function of beta ratio and Reynolds number. Whereas Venturi codes provide ranges of acceptable cone angles, this research provides the optimal recovery cone angle to minimize permanent pressure loss.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleOptimizing the ASME Venturi Recovery Cone Angle to Minimize Head Loss
typeJournal Paper
journal volume144
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001387
page04017057
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record