Show simple item record

contributor authorTaibai Shi
contributor authorWujun Chen
contributor authorChengjun Gao
contributor authorJianhui Hu
contributor authorZhenyu Qiu
date accessioned2017-12-16T09:01:44Z
date available2017-12-16T09:01:44Z
date issued2017
identifier other%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0002086.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4237589
description abstractBiaxial tension testing is an increasingly accepted tool to understand the mechanical behavior of architectural coated fabric membrane materials. However, different loading protocols in biaxial tests result in diverse results. This study investigates the different results between constant-force increment (CFI) and constant-rate (CR) loading protocols. Different loading procedures were proposed on a self-made biaxial tension tester to conduct systematic experiments. The mechanical behavior of a typical fabric was investigated by both CFI and CR loading. The stress-strain curves and their mechanical characteristics were compared. On the basis of test data, the authentic weft stress values in the CR loading protocol were observed to be 20% lower than the nominal load value. The elastic modulus determined by CR loading was significantly larger than that acquired by CFI loading. An obvious viscous effect is seen in the unloading stage under CFI loading. This did not arise under CR loading. Future work might focus on material to further strengthen the conclusion.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparison of Constant-Force Increment and Constant-Rate Loading Protocols in Biaxial Tests of Coated Fabrics
typeJournal Paper
journal volume29
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002086
treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record