Show simple item record

contributor authorLai, Huan Sheng
contributor authorLiu, Kang Lin
date accessioned2017-11-25T07:19:07Z
date available2017-11-25T07:19:07Z
date copyright2017/26/5
date issued2017
identifier issn0094-9930
identifier otherpvt_139_04_041101.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235603
description abstractShells and tubes usually fail in the form of buckling under external pressure. Charts are used in the design of shells and tubes in the standards of ASME VIII-1 and EN13445-3 and these simplify the calculation process, while the proportional law is a more effective and simple method. In this paper, the relationships between the proportional law and the charts used in the standards were researched; finite element method (FEM) was used to compare the accuracies of the proportional law and the charts. It was theoretically proved that the proportional law and the charts were using essentially the same method to calculate the critical buckling pressure; they were different forms of the same dimensionless tension stress–strain curves. The simulation results showed that the proportional law and the charts had effectively equal accuracies in calculated critical buckling pressures. Therefore, the proportional law can be a candidate method included in the standards for the design of shells and tubes under external pressure.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleRelationships Between the Proportional Law and the Charts Used in ASME VIII-1 and EN13445-3 for Designing Shells and Tubes Under External Pressure
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4036531
journal fristpage41101
journal lastpage041101-6
treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record