Show simple item record

contributor authorUddin, M. S.
contributor authorSidek, M. F. R.
contributor authorFaizal, M. A.
contributor authorGhomashchi, Reza
contributor authorPramanik, A.
date accessioned2017-11-25T07:17:53Z
date available2017-11-25T07:17:53Z
date copyright2017/1/6
date issued2017
identifier issn1087-1357
identifier othermanu_139_08_081018.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4234816
description abstractThis paper presents a comprehensive experimental study in exploring the influence of key printing parameters on mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) material. Three parameters with three levels—layer thickness (0.09 mm, 0.19 mm, and 0.39 mm), printing plane (XY, YZ, and ZX), and printing orientation (horizontal, diagonal, and vertical)—are considered, which form an L27 experimental design. Following L27, tensile and compressive specimens are fabricated and tested. Young's modulus, yield strength, failure strength, and strain of specimens are measured, evaluated, and compared with their injection-molded counterparts. Experimental results indicate that tensile specimens with a layer thickness of 0.09 mm and printing plane orientation of YZ-H reveal the highest stiffness and failure strength. While injection-molded specimen shows the highest yield strength, ductility of printed specimens is 1.45 times larger than that of injection-molded part. YZ along with XY specimens shows a neat and clean standard fracture failure at 45 deg, where the layers reorient themselves followed by stretching before fracture failure, thus providing sufficient ductility as opposed to ZX specimens, which fail along the direction perpendicular to the loading. Compressive XY-H and XY-D specimens have the highest stiffness and yield strength, and failure mechanisms involve initial compression followed by squeezing of layers leading to compactness followed by breakage due to tearing off or fracture of layers. The findings imply that anisotropy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) parts cannot be avoided and hence the appropriate parameters must be chosen, which satisfy the intended properties of the material subject to specific loading scenario.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleEvaluating Mechanical Properties and Failure Mechanisms of Fused Deposition Modeling Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Parts
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4036713
journal fristpage81018
journal lastpage081018-12
treeJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record