| contributor author | Mauder, Tomas | |
| contributor author | Charvat, Pavel | |
| contributor author | Stetina, Josef | |
| contributor author | Klimes, Lubomir | |
| date accessioned | 2017-11-25T07:16:56Z | |
| date available | 2017-11-25T07:16:56Z | |
| date copyright | 2017/11/4 | |
| date issued | 2017 | |
| identifier issn | 0022-1481 | |
| identifier other | ht_139_08_084502.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4234307 | |
| description abstract | The fast and accurate modeling of phase change is of a significant importance in many processes from steel casting to latent heat thermal energy storage. The paper presents a numerical case study on the transient 3D heat diffusion problem with phase change. Three different approaches to modeling of the solid–liquid phase change in combination with four commonly used numerical schemes are compared for their efficiency, accuracy, applicability, simplicity of implementation, and robustness. The possibility of parallel decomposition of the approaches is also discussed. The results indicate that the best accuracy was achieved with the second-order implicit methods, and the best efficiency was reached with the simple explicit methods. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Assessment of Basic Approaches to Numerical Modeling of Phase Change Problems—Accuracy, Efficiency, and Parallel Decomposition | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 139 | |
| journal issue | 8 | |
| journal title | Journal of Heat Transfer | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4036081 | |
| journal fristpage | 84502 | |
| journal lastpage | 084502-5 | |
| tree | Journal of Heat Transfer:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 008 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |