Show simple item record

contributor authorAchtemeier, Gary L.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:39:57Z
date available2017-06-09T17:39:57Z
date copyright1979/03/01
date issued1979
identifier issn0021-8952
identifier otherams-9663.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4233176
description abstractOperational and experimental convective cloud-seeding projects are often planned without regard to the number of seeding-opportunity days that can be lost because of the need to suspend operations during the threat of severe weather. June daily rainfall, severe storm and tornado watches, and observed tornadoes within a hypothetical (proposed) operational area over southwest Kansas were compared within the context of five procedures for severe weather related operations suspensions. These procedures varied in the restrictions placed on operations. The results show that anywhere from 45?87% of the June rain can fall when operations have been suspended. The length of a scientific seeding experiment could be increased anywhere from 45?426%. Finally, 46% of the tornadoes occurred when there were no concurrent tornado watches. This failure rate is so large that severe weather watches may not be useful for operations suspension procedures.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titlePlanned Weather Modification and the Severe Weather Threat in the Central High Plains
typeJournal Paper
journal volume18
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1979)018<0348:PWMATS>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage348
journal lastpage354
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;1979:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record