Show simple item record

contributor authorTripathi, Om P.
contributor authorBaldwin, Mark
contributor authorCharlton-Perez, Andrew
contributor authorCharron, Martin
contributor authorCheung, Jacob C. H.
contributor authorEckermann, Stephen D.
contributor authorGerber, Edwin
contributor authorJackson, David R.
contributor authorKuroda, Yuhji
contributor authorLang, Andrea
contributor authorMcLay, Justin
contributor authorMizuta, Ryo
contributor authorReynolds, Carolyn
contributor authorRoff, Greg
contributor authorSigmond, Michael
contributor authorSon, Seok-Woo
contributor authorStockdale, Tim
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:32:56Z
date available2017-06-09T17:32:56Z
date copyright2016/05/01
date issued2015
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-87072.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4230701
description abstracthe first multimodel study to estimate the predictability of a boreal sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) is performed using five NWP systems. During the 2012/13 boreal winter, anomalous upward propagating planetary wave activity was observed toward the end of December, which was followed by a rapid deceleration of the westerly circulation around 2 January 2013, and on 7 January 2013 the zonal-mean zonal wind at 60°N and 10 hPa reversed to easterly. This stratospheric dynamical activity was followed by an equatorward shift of the tropospheric jet stream and by a high pressure anomaly over the North Atlantic, which resulted in severe cold conditions in the United Kingdom and northern Europe. In most of the five models, the SSW event was predicted 10 days in advance. However, only some ensemble members in most of the models predicted weakening of westerly wind when the models were initialized 15 days in advance of the SSW. Further dynamical analysis of the SSW shows that this event was characterized by the anomalous planetary wavenumber-1 amplification followed by the anomalous wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere, which resulted in a split vortex occurring between 6 and 8 January 2013. The models have some success in reproducing wavenumber-1 activity when initialized 15 days in advance, but they generally failed to produce the wavenumber-2 activity during the final days of the event. Detailed analysis shows that models have reasonably good skill in forecasting tropospheric blocking features that stimulate wavenumber-2 amplification in the troposphere, but they have limited skill in reproducing wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleExamining the Predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 Using Multiple NWP Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume144
journal issue5
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/MWR-D-15-0010.1
journal fristpage1935
journal lastpage1960
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2015:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record