| description abstract | he use of ensembles in numerical weather prediction models is becoming an increasingly effective method of forecasting. Many studies have shown that using the mean of an ensemble as a deterministic solution produces the most accurate forecasts. However, the mean will eventually lose its usefulness as a deterministic forecast in the presence of nonlinearity. At synoptic scales, this appears to occur between 12- and 24-h forecast time, and on storm scales it may occur significantly faster due to stronger nonlinearity. When this does occur, the question then becomes the following: Should the mean still be adhered to, or would a different approach produce better results? This paper will investigate the usefulness of the mean within a WRF Model utilizing an ensemble Kalman filter for severe convective events.To determine when the mean becomes unrealistic, the divergence of the mean of the ensemble (?mean?) and a deterministic forecast initialized from a set of mean initial conditions (?control?) are examined. It is found that significant divergence between the mean and control emerges no later than 6 h into a convective event. The mean and control are each compared to observations, with the control being more accurate for nearly all forecasts studied. For the case where the mean provides a better forecast than the control, an approach is offered to identify the member or group of members that is closest to the mean. Such a forecast will contain similar forecast errors as the mean, but unlike the mean, will be on an actual forecast trajectory. | |
