Show simple item record

contributor authorBürger, Gerd
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:08:29Z
date available2017-06-09T17:08:29Z
date copyright2014/02/01
date issued2013
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-80020.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4222866
description abstractn a recent paper, Maraun describes the adverse effects of quantile mapping on downscaling. He argues that when large-scale GCM variables are rescaled directly to small-scale fields or even station data, genuine small-scale covariability is lost and replaced by uniform variability inherited from the larger scales. This leads to a misrepresentation mainly of areal means and long-term trends. This comment acknowledges the former point, although the argument is relatively old, but disagrees with the latter, showing that grid-size long-term trends can be different from local trends. Finally, because it is partly incorrectly addressed, some clarification is added regarding the inflation issue, stressing that neither randomization nor inflation is free of unverified assumptions.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComment on “Bias Correction, Quantile Mapping, and Downscaling: Revisiting the Inflation Issue”
typeJournal Paper
journal volume27
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00184.1
journal fristpage1819
journal lastpage1820
treeJournal of Climate:;2013:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record