| contributor author | Egger, Joseph | |
| contributor author | Hoinka, Klaus-Peter | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:34:37Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T16:34:37Z | |
| date copyright | 2010/12/01 | |
| date issued | 2010 | |
| identifier issn | 0022-4928 | |
| identifier other | ams-70301.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4212066 | |
| description abstract | Given the distribution of one atmospheric variable, that of nearly all others can be derived in balanced flow. In particular, potential vorticity inversion (PVI) selects potential vorticity (PV) to derive pressure, winds, and potential temperature ?. Potential temperature inversion (PTI) starts from available ? fields to derive pressure, winds, and PV. While PVI has been applied extensively, PTI has hardly been used as a research tool although the related technical steps are well known and simpler than those needed in PVI. Two idealized examples of PTI and PVI are compared. The 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40) datasets are used to determine typical anomalies of PV and ? in the North Atlantic storm-track region. Statistical forms of PVI and PTI are applied to these anomalies. The inversions are equivalent but the results of PTI are generally easier to understand than those of PVI. The issues of attribution and piecewise inversion are discussed. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Potential Temperature and Potential Vorticity Inversion: Complementary Approaches | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 67 | |
| journal issue | 12 | |
| journal title | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/2010JAS3532.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 4001 | |
| journal lastpage | 4016 | |
| tree | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2010:;Volume( 067 ):;issue: 012 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |