Show simple item record

contributor authorEgger, Joseph
contributor authorHoinka, Klaus-Peter
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:34:37Z
date available2017-06-09T16:34:37Z
date copyright2010/12/01
date issued2010
identifier issn0022-4928
identifier otherams-70301.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4212066
description abstractGiven the distribution of one atmospheric variable, that of nearly all others can be derived in balanced flow. In particular, potential vorticity inversion (PVI) selects potential vorticity (PV) to derive pressure, winds, and potential temperature ?. Potential temperature inversion (PTI) starts from available ? fields to derive pressure, winds, and PV. While PVI has been applied extensively, PTI has hardly been used as a research tool although the related technical steps are well known and simpler than those needed in PVI. Two idealized examples of PTI and PVI are compared. The 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40) datasets are used to determine typical anomalies of PV and ? in the North Atlantic storm-track region. Statistical forms of PVI and PTI are applied to these anomalies. The inversions are equivalent but the results of PTI are generally easier to understand than those of PVI. The issues of attribution and piecewise inversion are discussed.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titlePotential Temperature and Potential Vorticity Inversion: Complementary Approaches
typeJournal Paper
journal volume67
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
identifier doi10.1175/2010JAS3532.1
journal fristpage4001
journal lastpage4016
treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2010:;Volume( 067 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record