Show simple item record

contributor authorMarzban, Caren
contributor authorLakshmanan, V.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:12:25Z
date available2017-06-09T16:12:25Z
date copyright1999/06/01
date issued1999
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-63302.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4204291
description abstractGandin and Murphy (GM) have shown that if a skill score is linear in the scoring matrix, and if the scoring matrix is symmetric, then in the two-event case there exists a unique, ?equitable? skill score, namely, the True Skill Score (or Kuipers?s performance index). As such, this measure is treated as preferable to other measures because of its equitability. However, in most practical situations the scoring matrix is not symmetric due to the unequal costs associated with false alarms and misses. As a result, GM?s considerations must be reexamined without the assumption of a symmetric scoring matrix. In this note, it will be proven that if the scoring matrix is nonsymmetric, then there does not exist a unique performance measure, linear in the scoring matrix, that would satisfy any constraints of equitability. In short, there does not exist a unique, equitable skill score for two-category events that have unequal costs associated with a miss and a false alarm.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleOn the Uniqueness of Gandin and Murphy’s Equitable Performance Measures
typeJournal Paper
journal volume127
journal issue6
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1134:OTUOGA>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1134
journal lastpage1136
treeMonthly Weather Review:;1999:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record