Show simple item record

contributor authorFinkelstein, P. L.
contributor authorKaimal, J. C.
contributor authorGaynor, J. E.
contributor authorGraves, M. E.
contributor authorLockhart, T. J.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:39:02Z
date available2017-06-09T14:39:02Z
date copyright1986/12/01
date issued1986
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-236.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4160178
description abstractMeasurements of wind speed, wind direction, and the vertical component of turbulence, from four different commercially available Doppler sodars, are compared with similar measurements from in situ sensors on a 300 m instrumented tower. Results indicate that the four sodars measure wind speed and direction accurately and with reasonably high precision. The sodars tended to overestimate the vertical component of turbulence at night and to underestimate it during the day. Precision in those measurements was considerably poorer than for the averaged speeds and directions. Analysis of the vertical wind speed measurements from the sodars indicates that the measurement inaccuracies arise from a combination of aliasing and spatial averaging. Comparison of five in situ wind systems with a sonic anemometer are presented in Part I of this two part series of papers.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComparison of Wind Monitoring Systems. Pad II: Doppley. Sodars
typeJournal Paper
journal volume3
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(1986)003<0594:COWMSP>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage594
journal lastpage604
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1986:;volume( 003 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record