| contributor author | Ingleby, N. Bruce | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T14:24:26Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T14:24:26Z | |
| date copyright | 2001/06/01 | |
| date issued | 2001 | |
| identifier issn | 0739-0572 | |
| identifier other | ams-1872.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4154756 | |
| description abstract | The accuracy achievable for surface ship pressure reports and the sources of error in them are discussed. In The Met Office numerical weather prediction (NWP) system the error is estimated as 1 hPa, whereas Kent et al. calculated a figure of about 2.3 hPa. There are a number of reasons for this discrepancy, but the main one is that quality control using short-range forecasts is much better at detecting gross errors in the reports than are climatological checks. Statistics from the Met Office NWP system are presented for comparison of pressure and other atmospheric variables. Other variables show much less discrepancy than pressure because, relative to observation error, they have a smaller climatological range. Both sets of statistics show larger air temperature errors at high latitudes/low temperatures. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Comments on “A Statistical Determination of the Random Observational Errors Present in Voluntary Observing Ships’ Meteorological Reports” | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 18 | |
| journal issue | 6 | |
| journal title | Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1102:NACOAS>2.0.CO;2 | |
| journal fristpage | 1102 | |
| journal lastpage | 1108 | |
| tree | Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2001:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 006 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |