Show simple item record

contributor authorIngleby, N. Bruce
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:24:26Z
date available2017-06-09T14:24:26Z
date copyright2001/06/01
date issued2001
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-1872.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4154756
description abstractThe accuracy achievable for surface ship pressure reports and the sources of error in them are discussed. In The Met Office numerical weather prediction (NWP) system the error is estimated as 1 hPa, whereas Kent et al. calculated a figure of about 2.3 hPa. There are a number of reasons for this discrepancy, but the main one is that quality control using short-range forecasts is much better at detecting gross errors in the reports than are climatological checks. Statistics from the Met Office NWP system are presented for comparison of pressure and other atmospheric variables. Other variables show much less discrepancy than pressure because, relative to observation error, they have a smaller climatological range. Both sets of statistics show larger air temperature errors at high latitudes/low temperatures.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComments on “A Statistical Determination of the Random Observational Errors Present in Voluntary Observing Ships’ Meteorological Reports”
typeJournal Paper
journal volume18
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1102:NACOAS>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1102
journal lastpage1108
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2001:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record