Show simple item record

contributor authorNeiburger, M.
contributor authorSherman, L.
contributor authorKellogg, W. W.
contributor authorGustafson, A. F.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:09:52Z
date available2017-06-09T14:09:52Z
date copyright1948/06/01
date issued1948
identifier issn0095-9634
identifier otherams-13617.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4149087
description abstractFrom a statistical analysis of geostrophic- and gradient-wind computations for all stations reporting winds on two 700-mb charts, it is shown that there is a variability of about 25 per cent in the computations by different individuals, and that the computed values differed by about 35 per cent from the observed wind speed on the average. The percentual deviation was smaller for strong winds. The gradient wind computed. using approximate trajectory curvature was only slightly better than the geostrophic, and using contour curvature it was worse. The geostrophic wind thus appears to be the best approximation which can be computed from the pressure field alone. Theoretical expressions for the deviations of the computed from the observed speeds and velocities are derived. These show that the gradient speed is always greater than the true speed. The gradient speed is of shown to be a better approximation than the geostrophic for most cases, but for some cases of curved cross-isobaric flow the geostrophic speed is closer to the true speed. The vector deviation of the gradient wind is, of course, larger than the scalar for cross-isobaric flow.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleON THE COMPUTATION OF WIND FROM PRESSURE DATA
typeJournal Paper
journal volume5
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Meteorology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1948)005<0087:OTCOWF>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage87
journal lastpage92
treeJournal of Meteorology:;1948:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record